We screened our horror trailer to the media class and asked them to give feedbackon it, firstly based on whether it worked as a good horror trailer, and secondly if it worked as a teaser trailer.
The audience said that our our trailer worked well as a horror text:
-The shadows were good
-It was filmed from some good strange angles
-A wide range of shots was used
-Good mise-en-scene used to create the idea of isolation
-Good use of white flash
-The heartbeat sound used
-Good lighting used
-The idea of the final girl
Although they also criticised it as a horror text:
-No dialogue
-A locked tension, so no real climax
-Inconsistency of font and effects on intertitles
-Some didnt like the hearbeat sound
They said it worked well as a teaser trailer:
-Started slow and then built up
-The heartbeats in the soundtrack
-Didnt give too much away
Although it was criticised as a teaser trailer:
-The music didnt really build up, bangs in the music would have made it more effective
-The same parts were shown a couple of times, wasted time in the short trailer
-not much plot
Having taken the audiences research into consideration we did a 'second cut' to our product and edited it to fit the horror genre better. This should be an improvement from the 'first cut' so using audience feedback is a good idea as it gets the point of view of many more people than just our group who made it.
Portfolio Sections
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Your first sentence is a bit unclear - the feedback was on teaser trailer success and horror GENRE success.
ReplyDeleteWho did you get your feedback from? What was your TA? What - specifically - were the changes you made as a result of your test screening?